SendiventvsNovu

Both solve the same problem — Novu is open-source and self-hostable, Sendivent is hosted and simpler.

Sendivent
  • Fully hosted, zero infrastructure
  • Simple event-based API
  • Predictable pricing
  • 5-minute setup
Novu
  • Open-source, self-hostable
  • Advanced workflow engine
  • More configuration options
  • Requires infrastructure management
Quick verdict

Choose Sendivent if...

  • You want a hosted solution with no infrastructure to manage
  • You prefer simplicity over maximum configurability
  • You're an indie dev or small team
  • You want to start sending notifications in minutes, not hours

?Choose Novu if...

  • You need to self-host for compliance reasons
  • You want an open-source solution you can audit
  • You need complex workflow orchestration
  • You have DevOps capacity to manage the infrastructure
FeatureSendiventNovu
Open source
Self-hostable
Fully managedCloud option
Setup timeMinutesMinutes (cloud), hours+ if self-hosted
Workflow engineSimpleAdvanced
Email
SMS
Slack
PushRoadmap
In-app inbox

The notification infrastructure landscape

Novu is one of the best-known open-source notification infrastructure projects. It's powerful, flexible, and self-hostable. Sendivent takes a different approach: fully managed, opinionated, and optimized for simplicity.

Philosophy differences

Novu's philosophy: Give developers maximum control and flexibility through an open-source platform with advanced workflow capabilities.

Sendivent's philosophy: Handle the infrastructure so you can focus on your product. Simple API, managed service, clear pricing, and notification templates your team can edit without code.

When open-source matters

Novu is the better choice if:

  • You must self-host for compliance or data residency
  • You want to audit the code or contribute improvements
  • You need complex digest/batching workflows
  • You have DevOps resources to manage infrastructure

When hosted wins

Sendivent is the better choice if:

  • You want zero infrastructure to manage
  • You prefer predictable costs without hosting fees
  • You're a small team without dedicated DevOps
  • You value faster time to value over maximum flexibility

Novu also offers a managed cloud product. But if you choose the open-source / self-hosted route, you're responsible for running and scaling the stack yourself.

The honest tradeoff

Novu gives you more power. Sendivent gives you less to manage. For most indie developers and small SaaS teams, the simplicity tradeoff is worth it.

See how Sendivent handles common use cases like user onboarding, password resets, and payment alerts with minimal setup.

Code Comparison

Novu setup (self-hosted)

# Step 1: Clone and run Docker
git clone https://github.com/novuhq/novu && cd novu
docker-compose up

# Step 2: Configure providers in dashboard
# Step 3: Create workflows
# Step 4: Integrate SDK
import { Novu } from '@novu/node';
const novu = new Novu('YOUR_API_KEY');

await novu.trigger('order-confirmation', {
  to: { subscriberId: user.id },
  payload: { orderId, items }
});

You get maximum control, but you also own the infrastructure.

Sendivent setup

# Step 1: Sign up (60 seconds)
# Step 2: Get API key
# Step 3: Send
await sendivent
  .event('order.confirmed')
  .to({ email: user.email })
  .payload({ orderId, items })
  .send();

No Docker, no infrastructure, no maintenance. The trade-off is less control.


Want multi-channel without the ops work? Start with a free account and send your first notification in minutes. No self-hosting, no infrastructure decisions, just working notifications.

Last compared: January 2026

Readytosimplifyyournotifications?

Start sending multi-channel notifications in minutes. No complex setup, no vendor lock-in.

Free to start
No credit card required
5 minute setup