SendiventvsNovu
Both solve the same problem — Novu is open-source and self-hostable, Sendivent is hosted and simpler.
- Fully hosted, zero infrastructure
- Simple event-based API
- Predictable pricing
- 5-minute setup
- Open-source, self-hostable
- Complex workflow engine
- More configuration options
- Requires infrastructure management
Choose Sendivent if...
- You want a hosted solution with no infrastructure to manage
- You prefer simplicity over maximum configurability
- You're an indie dev or small team
- You want to start sending notifications in minutes, not hours
?Choose Novu if...
- You need to self-host for compliance reasons
- You want an open-source solution you can audit
- You need complex workflow orchestration
- You have DevOps capacity to manage the infrastructure
| Feature | Sendivent | Novu |
|---|---|---|
| Open source | ||
| Self-hostable | ||
| Fully managed | Cloud option | |
| Setup time | 5 minutes | Hours to days |
| Workflow engine | Simple | Advanced |
| SMS | ||
| Slack | ||
| Push | ||
| In-app inbox |
The notification infrastructure landscape
Novu pioneered the open-source notification infrastructure space. It's powerful, flexible, and self-hostable. Sendivent takes a different approach: fully managed, opinionated, and optimized for simplicity.
Philosophy differences
Novu's philosophy: Give developers maximum control and flexibility through an open-source platform with advanced workflow capabilities.
Sendivent's philosophy: Handle the infrastructure so you can focus on your product. Simple API, managed service, clear pricing.
When open-source matters
Novu is the better choice if:
- You must self-host for compliance or data residency
- You want to audit the code or contribute improvements
- You need complex digest/batching workflows
- You have DevOps resources to manage infrastructure
When hosted wins
Sendivent is the better choice if:
- You want zero infrastructure to manage
- You prefer predictable costs without hosting fees
- You're a small team without dedicated DevOps
- You value faster time to value over maximum flexibility
The honest tradeoff
Novu gives you more power. Sendivent gives you less to manage. For most indie developers and small SaaS teams, the simplicity tradeoff is worth it.
See how Sendivent handles common use cases like user onboarding, password resets, and payment alerts with minimal setup.
Last compared: November 2024
Related content
Compare Sendivent and Courier for product notifications. See how our indie-friendly approach differs from Courier's enterprise platform.
Read moreCompare Sendivent and Knock for product notifications. See how our simple approach differs from Knock's workflow-centric platform.
Read moreCompare Sendivent and SuprSend for product notifications. See how these multi-channel platforms differ in approach and pricing.
Read moreCompare Sendivent and Fyno for notifications. See how our focused approach differs from Fyno's provider abstraction layer.
Read moreShould you build your own notification system or use Sendivent? Compare the time, cost, and complexity of DIY vs buying.
Read moreCompare Sendivent and Mailgun for notifications. See how multi-channel notifications compare to Mailgun's email infrastructure.
Read moreReadytosimplifyyournotifications?
Start sending multi-channel notifications in minutes. No complex setup, no vendor lock-in.