SendiventvsAWSSNS+SES
AWS gives you the building blocks. Sendivent gives you the finished product.
- Ready-to-use notification platform
- One API for all channels
- Dashboard for non-developers
- Templates and multi-language
- Raw cloud primitives
- Pay-per-use pricing
- Maximum AWS integration
- Requires significant development
Choose Sendivent if...
- You want a ready-to-use notification product
- You don't want to build infrastructure on AWS primitives
- Your team needs a dashboard to manage notifications
- You want templates and multi-language without building them
?Choose AWS SNS + SES if...
- You're deeply invested in AWS and want everything there
- You have engineers to build the notification layer
- You need maximum control over AWS infrastructure
- Cost optimization at massive scale is critical
| Feature | Sendivent | AWS SNS + SES |
|---|---|---|
| SES | ||
| SMS | SNS | |
| Slack | Build yourself | |
| Push | SNS | |
| Ready to use | ||
| Dashboard | Build yourself | |
| Templates | Build yourself | |
| Multi-language | Build yourself | |
| Setup time | Minutes | Weeks |
Primitives vs products
AWS SES handles email delivery. AWS SNS handles SMS and push. They're powerful, reliable, and cheap at scale.
But they're primitives, not products. To build a notification system on AWS, you need to:
- Build an API layer on top of SES/SNS
- Handle template management
- Build a dashboard for your team
- Implement multi-language support
- Create analytics and logging
- Handle failures and retries
- Add Slack integration (AWS doesn't do this)
That's significant engineering work.
The AWS appeal
AWS makes sense if:
- You want everything in one cloud
- You have engineers to build the layer
- You're at massive scale where AWS pricing wins
- You need deep AWS integration
The product appeal
Sendivent makes sense if:
- You want to ship notifications, not build infrastructure
- You need your team to manage messages without engineering
- You value time over maximum control
- You want Slack and other channels AWS doesn't cover
Cost comparison
AWS is cheap per message. But the cost of building and maintaining the product layer can dwarf the per-message savings.
Sendivent's pricing is simple: based on people notified. No complex AWS cost calculation, no engineering time to budget.
The honest tradeoff
AWS gives you maximum control and potential cost savings at scale. Sendivent gives you a finished product immediately. For most teams, the product wins.
When to use AWS directly
- Massive scale (millions of notifications daily)
- Deep AWS investment already
- Team with time to build and maintain
- Specific AWS compliance requirements
When to use Sendivent
- Want to ship now, not build infrastructure
- Need non-developer team access
- Value simplicity over maximum control
- Don't want to maintain notification infrastructure
Last compared: November 2024
Related content
Should you build your own notification system or use Sendivent? Compare the time, cost, and complexity of DIY vs buying.
Read moreCompare Sendivent and Twilio for notifications. See how Sendivent's unified API compares to building on Twilio's communication primitives.
Read moreAchieve 99%+ inbox placement with Sendivent's enterprise-grade email infrastructure. DKIM, SPF, DMARC authentication, reputation monitoring, and bounce handling built-in.
Read moreCompare Sendivent's unified notification platform to building with Twilio SMS and SendGrid email. See why one API beats stitching providers together.
Read moreBuild beautiful notification templates with Handlebars, preview across channels, and personalize content for every user. No code changes needed to update templates.
Read moreReadytosimplifyyournotifications?
Start sending multi-channel notifications in minutes. No complex setup, no vendor lock-in.